Episode 110

full
Published on:

16th Sep 2025

From Gerrymandered Chaos to Fair Districts: Unlocking Real Voter Power

Tired of politicians redrawing maps to rig wins? Jerremy, Dave, and Reed dismantle gerrymandering as democracy's silent manipulator, birthed in 1812 and now supercharged by data. They spotlight solutions like county-line districts and tech upgrades to foster competition, while stressing civic education's role in preparing generations—think mock elections—to demand pragmatic leaders over polarized extremes.

Timestamps:

  • (00:00) Gerrymandering Roots: Hidden Map Twists
  • (01:15) Reforms Ahead: County Lines and Tech Fixes
  • (14:07) Voting Tech: Phones, IDs, and Ease
  • (18:19) Education Gaps: Civics in Schools
  • (19:42) Voter Literacy: Boosting Turnout
  • (21:02) Mock Elections: Hands-On Government
  • (22:22) Real Applications: Building Informed Citizens


📢 Solving America’s Problems Podcast – Real Solutions For Real Issues

🎧 Listen on  Apple | Spotify | & More!

🌍 Join the conversation on Instagram | YouTubeX

Transcript
Alex:

Gerrymandering might sound like insider talk, but it's the

2

:

hidden force deciding your voice

before election day even starts.

3

:

Drawing from two centuries of twisted

maps, our discussion with Reed cuts

4

:

through the mess to spotlight simple

solutions—like sticking to county lines

5

:

or rethinking tech in voting—that could

bring back fair play and real progress.

6

:

Jerremy: But I think you use a very

interesting term that does come up a

7

:

lot, Reed, which is disenfranchise.

8

:

And I would like to hear a little bit

more about that because if a group of

9

:

individuals feels disenfranchised, do you

think they have the, or do they currently

10

:

have the ability to determine where this

mythical salamander boundary begins?

11

:

Should they even vote if they see

themselves in this really weirdly

12

:

shaped, dis voting district where

they're like, listen my voice

13

:

literally will not matter at all.

14

:

I shouldn't even show up and turn out.

15

:

Reed: I think they should because

it's a protest vote, at that point.

16

:

But you still need to cast your

vote because that's the only

17

:

lever that you have to pull.

18

:

But I can understand why people

wouldn't at the same time.

19

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

20

:

Yeah.

21

:

absolutely.

22

:

So if it's been around essentially since

the entire formation of our country,

23

:

more or less, how do we get rid of it?

24

:

Is it something that we should get rid of?

25

:

Is it even get

26

:

Ridable?

27

:

Reed: that is a really good question.

28

:

I think it would require it would

require an interest in both sides

29

:

to have some kind of fair District

Amendment or bill that they would pass.

30

:

Because if both, if one side or the

other sees an advantage that they can

31

:

have in the current system, they're

not gonna want to pass an amendment.

32

:

It makes perfect logical sense to

us why Congress people should not

33

:

be allowed to trade stocks, right?

34

:

But they're not passing an

amendment banning themselves

35

:

from trading stocks anytime soon.

36

:

And I think Gerrymandering's

kind of the same, the same thing.

37

:

So I, I don't know if I don't know

how realistically it would get fixed

38

:

maybe the Supreme Court but you would,

the Supreme Court only decides on

39

:

cases, so they don't really, they

wouldn't really have a a role to play

40

:

in that.

41

:

If the system right now, this is in

the public discourse because we have

42

:

Texas and California and Illinois all

threatening to gerrymander their states.

43

:

Basically because of Texas

being the number one actor.

44

:

If every state gerrymanders

themselves to maximize congressional

45

:

districts, the Republicans will win.

46

:

They'll win more states and basically have

an unassailable majority in the house.

47

:

And then I don't see them

turning around and passing a fair

48

:

district act after they've won

49

:

the baton,

50

:

So what do you think?

51

:

Jerremy: I, no, it's right.

52

:

It's been a it's been

happening for a very long time.

53

:

My random thought that I was having a

discussion with Dave about was, at what

54

:

point does someone to some level of

power say, don't we already have lines

55

:

drawn that are called counties like.

56

:

We, that should be the congressional

I'm so confused on how we get the

57

:

squiggles of where some random interest

gets created by whoever's draw.

58

:

I wanna know who's drawing the lines.

59

:

Who's that person specifically the

political scientist that connects

60

:

with the person that has the data,

that has all the information that

61

:

goes, Hey, this is where Dave lives.

62

:

You want Dave's vote?

63

:

We gotta circle building 13 A in this

random redrawing of this district line.

64

:

But to your point and to, and

my thought process is like, we

65

:

already have these lines drawn.

66

:

We already have very discernible lines of

where counties begin, where cities begin,

67

:

where townships begin and we continue.

68

:

And it happens all the time.

69

:

Like the that's the thing about the

redrawing, like you said earlier, like

70

:

Illinois and other states are like,

Hey, Texas is doing it right now.

71

:

This could, this happens

frequently as new people move.

72

:

As interest changes, income changes,

as the economy changes and people move

73

:

different states and different places,

these lines continue to get redrawn.

74

:

This is not something that happens

every 15 years, something happens almost

75

:

every 15 months, which is really wild.

76

:

So we do need, I believe, someone of

a higher interest of a higher power,

77

:

of a bigger importance to really

just come down with some type of law.

78

:

And yeah, to your point, maybe present

a federal case with the Supreme Court

79

:

to say, listen, we need to change

these gerrymandering tactics and these

80

:

laws, because this is just almost

81

:

unfair.

82

:

It's like whoever has the

83

:

Reed: There would need to be a lawsuit.

84

:

And

85

:

the problem is that it's legal, so

86

:

there's not gonna be a lawsuit because

you have to allege a violation of

87

:

some law.

88

:

So it's, I, and the stated

reason for it is to accurately

89

:

reflect the voter base, right?

90

:

The stated reason for

redrawing the districts.

91

:

The real reason is to, I guess in

some cases that is the real reason,

92

:

but it has the effect of drawing

districts that are gerrymandered.

93

:

But they become, they're more

scientific the more detailed

94

:

the census gets and everything.

95

:

Like back in the day with Edward Jerry

the governor, it was a rough human

96

:

process of drawing districts, you knew

roughly how people voted in different

97

:

places, but how accurate was their

census compared to what we have now?

98

:

When we can break down to finite

details, how many households and

99

:

how many immigrants and ethnic

makeups of all these different areas,

100

:

that's what helps them be able to

gerrymander to such a scientific level.

101

:

And that makes

102

:

it more insidious today

than it was in the past.

103

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

104

:

Yeah, totally.

105

:

So if you're designing or redesigning

one part of voting from registration

106

:

to ballots to, changing gerrymandering,

what would you change first.

107

:

Reed: I would change

108

:

gerrymandering first.

109

:

Jerremy: That's it.

110

:

That's the biggest thing for you.

111

:

Okay.

112

:

So if that goes away, do you feel

everything becomes a lot more fair?

113

:

Everything becomes a lot more.

114

:

Predictable might not be the word, but

let's just say democratic, that goes away.

115

:

Things are a lot more reasonable.

116

:

Reed: I think that's the end.

117

:

That's the goal.

118

:

I think if politicians have to compete

for centrist in their districts because

119

:

the districts are more competitive,

then we're gonna end up with more

120

:

pragmatic people who are able to

actually negotiate with the other side.

121

:

And aren't just hotheaded partisans.

122

:

And then that will

123

:

give us, that would give us

a more functioning government

124

:

than what we have now.

125

:

Jerremy: Dave, what about you man?

126

:

If you had to if there's a

perfect system that exists,

127

:

what do you think it would look like?

128

:

Dave: It's definitely taken the

politicians out of this, right?

129

:

Yeah.

130

:

Gerrymandering's like really

high on that list, and I don't

131

:

hear anybody ever talk about it.

132

:

I was just looking at.

133

:

My district and I was

actually pretty impressed.

134

:

I live in a red state and it's pretty

firmly red and in Florida, and I'm

135

:

actually surprised my, my voting district

is just round, it's just, it's like

136

:

somebody drew a circle and I'm like, okay.

137

:

I don't know what the rest of it

looks like, but I'm like, I'm, that,

138

:

that seems it, it on the surface

139

:

Jerremy: take a circle.

140

:

Dave: yeah, it looks it looks okay.

141

:

Yeah, gerrymandering's like high on

that list I'd like more people to vote

142

:

and certainly that it's easier to vote.

143

:

I loved your idea in our first episode on

this, which is yeah we live in counties

144

:

and so just if you have, if you live in a

populous county, then yeah, you, your five

145

:

representatives represent that county.

146

:

If you live in a sparse

county, a rural county, then.

147

:

One representative might represent

like three or four counties.

148

:

I'm like, okay, that makes,

that makes a lot of sense to me.

149

:

That's yeah, I think that's spot on.

150

:

And then, making it easier to vote.

151

:

I'm fine with the IDs and stuff.

152

:

I'm actually okay with mail-in

balloting ballots too, because, we

153

:

have armed forces overseas that,

that do that all the time, so Yeah.

154

:

Yeah.

155

:

More people, more engaged.

156

:

I, the one that I'm clearly probably

standalone on this is that, we only have

157

:

438 representatives for Congress and

then another a hundred in the Senate,

158

:

and that was capped a long time ago.

159

:

I think we should have a lot

more representatives, and I think

160

:

that would also drive some more

diverse voices, rather than.

161

:

4 38, then maybe we have 600.

162

:

And that means that each representative

represents fewer people because our

163

:

population has grown and it's gonna keep

164

:

I, it's always like the will of the people

is, is the wi is the will of the people.

165

:

Are the will.

166

:

Yeah.

167

:

Is the will of the people being

representative right now represented

168

:

Right now, it doesn't feel that way.

169

:

So yeah.

170

:

More diversity for lack of a better term.

171

:

And more people like focused on the

issues that we all do care about.

172

:

Like what, when was the last

time we talked about healthcare?

173

:

That's like the number one thing

for people, or the economy,

174

:

like the number two thing.

175

:

It's all kitchen table issues.

176

:

instead we're talking about tariffs.

177

:

Oh my God, if I hear that one

more time, I'm gonna lose my mind.

178

:

Jerremy: yeah.

179

:

Reid, tell me a little bit more about

your general take on some countries will

180

:

actually fine people for not voting.

181

:

Do you think mandatory voting

could actually work in the

182

:

US?

183

:

Reed: It's like you're talking

about, earlier you mentioned the

184

:

people voter participation and

stuff like that and voter ID laws.

185

:

One of the bars to that is, is it,

I didn't actually know that voting

186

:

is not a right in the Constitution.

187

:

But one of the things that ties into

is do you consider voting a right.

188

:

Do you consider something like requiring

an ID to be an unnecessary bar?

189

:

'Cause it could be like a socioeconomic

even if it is a small barrier, it

190

:

could be a barrier to people to voting.

191

:

But is I think that the right

to vote or the right to abstain

192

:

from voting is basically as

important as the right to not vote.

193

:

So I don't really think mandatory

194

:

voting would hold up in this country.

195

:

You have the freedom, right?

196

:

We're all

197

:

about freedom.

198

:

So you should have the freedom to not

vote if you don't want to, and how

199

:

would you implement mandatory voting?

200

:

Just everybody vote from their phones

201

:

on

202

:

Snapchat or

203

:

Jerremy: Yep, it's, that's right.

204

:

And Snapchat overnight rallies 3%.

205

:

It's, a, I don't think, to your point,

making almost anything mandatory in

206

:

this country would ever actually work.

207

:

If you have to do something tell a bunch

of Americans, they gotta do something,

208

:

they're like that's not gonna work.

209

:

Dave: What if it was like you at

least gotta show up or you gotta,

210

:

pull up your phone, like our utopia.

211

:

Pull up and pull up your

phone and cast your vote.

212

:

Even if it, the vote is,

I'm not voting right.

213

:

Like at least you voted.

214

:

You voted for none of the above.

215

:

No.

216

:

Jerremy: Good take.

217

:

that Dave.

218

:

I like that Dave.

219

:

'Cause that, yeah, that's my utopia.

220

:

Like in a random way is again, there,

there has to be some technological

221

:

capacity where we make that pretty

ingrained using Biologistics u using

222

:

some type of fingerprint scan, using

some type of face scan, using something

223

:

where you at least have that capacity.

224

:

Again, maybe it doesn't start with

everybody, but maybe it starts

225

:

with people that want to do it.

226

:

I think more people have phones

than they have IDs in the country,

227

:

so that'd be, fascinating.

228

:

But to, to your point, Dave.

229

:

Yeah.

230

:

If they said, Hey, listen,

everyone has to vote.

231

:

Your vote can be, I don't care

that, and that's a button.

232

:

You click the button, all is good.

233

:

You can leave.

234

:

Don't have to tell us

what you actually think.

235

:

I think the participation.

236

:

One I fully believe, and I think

it'd be fun to see like the

237

:

percentages of voting and how it has

shifted and transformed over time.

238

:

When I did my intro right, 65% of

people that voted and that was the

239

:

third largest ever seems radically low,

240

:

Dave: Yeah,

241

:

Jerremy: right?

242

:

Like you would, I would think like

hundreds,:

243

:

hundred percent of people are voting

like, what else are they doing,

244

:

right?

245

:

Dave: A lot fewer people could

246

:

vote.

247

:

Like it

248

:

Reed: yeah.

249

:

Is

250

:

Dave: White people,

251

:

Reed: or is that,

252

:

Dave: White, guys.

253

:

It was about it, right?

254

:

Jerremy: YY well, exactly.

255

:

Yeah.

256

:

So that's the only people that can vote.

257

:

So all the people that can vote,

it's I guess from a population

258

:

standpoint.

259

:

Reed: actually one of the huge

reforms of Andrew Jackson.

260

:

And he was a, he was

the original Democrat.

261

:

He I don't know if he passed it, but

during his time was landholding males.

262

:

You could, now you just

had to be a white male.

263

:

They dropped the requirement to own land.

264

:

So that was

265

:

really Open the floodgates

for voters voter turnout,

266

:

Jerremy: Open the flood gaze.

267

:

Come on down.

268

:

Yeah.

269

:

Reed: and you gotta think of his support.

270

:

I would imagine he probably

benefited a lot from allowing non

271

:

landholding white males to vote.

272

:

Otherwise, he prob probably wouldn't have

273

:

been, the Jacksonian Democrat that he was.

274

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

275

:

Dave: Hey so let's say we

added tech to this, right?

276

:

Let's say you could vote from your

phone you buy stuff on your phone.

277

:

You do a lot of you trade on

your phone like you move money.

278

:

Like some of the most important things

in your life, you, you do on your

279

:

phone or in front of your computer.

280

:

Do you think, could we do that safely?

281

:

Jerremy: Reid, you're an

eng, you're an engineer.

282

:

Dave: yeah.

283

:

What do you think Reid?

284

:

Reed: Oh, I'm not an engineer.

285

:

No, I, but if you bank on your phone,

you can probably vote on your phone.

286

:

Yeah.

287

:

Because sure it has, there's holes in it.

288

:

But people, like you said,

people trust their whole life

289

:

savings with doing it electronically, not?

290

:

Dave: But I also get like a notification

it seems like once a month of

291

:

being like, Hey, your stuff's been

compromised on Pinterest or whatever.

292

:

Jerremy: Yeah, I mean there,

there's tech that can do it.

293

:

Or at some point, in my opinion, it, it

could, it can or could definitely be done.

294

:

We could figure it out.

295

:

We could figure out how to become

more tech savvy with voting.

296

:

I think that would increase

the capacity to vote.

297

:

I do think we should find

ways to make voting relatively

298

:

easier, safer, more trackable.

299

:

When I, say more trackable.

300

:

I just mean like, to, to Reid's

point, like the census of just, hey.

301

:

It's really, really easy to do this.

302

:

It's not that hard family fill out

this, sign up for this, do this thing.

303

:

I, I still find mail-in

voting very archaic.

304

:

And I think that if one were to do

that again, it should just be something

305

:

where it's maybe you have to go through

a couple more verification steps.

306

:

That's all.

307

:

Instead of one, which is just like you

show an ID and you take a vote, like just

308

:

a couple of, just two or three more steps.

309

:

Ultimately, because there are still tons

and tons of people who are not voting.

310

:

That's really the thought process.

311

:

So in your general circle, Reid,

the people that you just talked

312

:

to or hear about from your day to

day, why do you feel or hear or see

313

:

people that do not vote presently?

314

:

Like what's their big hangup

315

:

for it?

316

:

Reed: I think most people

in my circle do vote.

317

:

It's probably a higher turnout

than the general public.

318

:

But I think the hangout.

319

:

Four people is just civic literacy,

really just knowing when an election

320

:

is, a lot of people like the midterms

are coming up next year and everybody

321

:

knows the midterms are a very, it's

a low turnout election cycle because

322

:

people don't know there's an election.

323

:

The people know when there's presidential

election because how could you not?

324

:

But people don't really know when,

if there's not a president up for

325

:

election, they're not really aware

326

:

that there is

327

:

an election at all.

328

:

So it's just basic education

329

:

Really.

330

:

Dave: What What about you Jerremy?

331

:

Reed: And like you said the

332

:

highest turn election in history was

in:

333

:

So it was the center of the news

cycle and it, the election itself,

334

:

COVID was the primary issue.

335

:

So that was the one

election where everybody.

336

:

At least knew that there was an election.

337

:

Everybody had an opinion on it.

338

:

So it was the most involved

election, I think, I believe that

339

:

2008 was the previous record holder.

340

:

because Barack Obama, another

big historical election,

341

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

342

:

you

343

:

just

344

:

had the, the financial crisis and

Bush was getting out of office, so

345

:

you had multiple people running.

346

:

Yeah I think Dave, for me,

just thinking through man, I.

347

:

The way I see it, people not voting.

348

:

Our boy Reid nailed it.

349

:

He said, my favorite word it is education.

350

:

And again, back to just basic school,

I looked over my son Gabriel's 15,

351

:

15-year-old high school homework

last night when I got home at 10

352

:

o'clock from traveling all day.

353

:

Just glazed over it.

354

:

Just garbage.

355

:

Garbage.

356

:

Just garbage.

357

:

The things like the, he's, they, so

world history is a map of Europe.

358

:

Cool.

359

:

That's cool I guess.

360

:

Sure.

361

:

All right.

362

:

Thumbs up to map of Europe and then

math parallelograms just random geometry

363

:

shapes and like how to graph them.

364

:

Things of that nature.

365

:

And just a bunch of other, just so I'm

looking at this, thinking to myself,

366

:

knowing that we have this discussion

coming up, I wonder if any class

367

:

in his school is teaching the high

schoolers about the midterm elections.

368

:

I wonder if there's any class

where it's like, Hey, this is

369

:

what a midterm election is.

370

:

Here is like I, I get it that certain

schools have American government.

371

:

I realize that, but that's a very,

not only few and far in between,

372

:

but it's also something that's

gonna be taught very uniquely, very

373

:

interestingly, probably very polarizing.

374

:

And also just it's uninformed on

the general public of the general

375

:

public is lost on what's happening.

376

:

Remember, I am at the time, 26,

27, 28, going into a middle school.

377

:

Library casting votes for

things I have no clue about.

378

:

And I'm pretty well informed

on just the general world at

379

:

the time, for the most part.

380

:

And I don't know very much about anything

about who, what, who I'm voting for,

381

:

what I'm voting for, the purposes behind.

382

:

I'm voting.

383

:

There's just not a lot of information.

384

:

And so I think what would also be

relevant to Reed's Point is just some,

385

:

obviously Google has incredible access,

but I just don't feel like the general

386

:

public would agree that there's a really

beautiful system of open information and

387

:

education about what voting, who voting,

where, voting, why all the information.

388

:

A lot of the topics, a lot of the people.

389

:

Dave: Huh.

390

:

Jerremy: just feel like

that's the main point.

391

:

Obviously most of my people vote

as well, but the people that don't

392

:

vote in general, I think it's

just 'cause of lack of education.

393

:

They just don't know.

394

:

Dave: So did you all have like

civics classes and social study

395

:

classes and history classes?

396

:

Like I'm your son's 15, right?

397

:

Like I, I had all those things

I remember real clearly that my

398

:

teacher brought in sample ballots

and we'd actually go through it.

399

:

It'd be like, okay, how does this work?

400

:

And so did you have those classes?

401

:

Jerremy: never once.

402

:

Not me personally.

403

:

Reed.

404

:

Reed: I don't really remember if we

had anything specifically like that.

405

:

I think the high school level history

and civics is severely lacking.

406

:

And I took AP classes in high school,

and then I minored in history in

407

:

college, so I don't really have a.

408

:

Normal experience.

409

:

Like I think I, I received more

history education than most people do.

410

:

But I just had a thought while you were

talking Jerremy about what would be a

411

:

great idea for a government high school

class or a government civics class.

412

:

You could divide the class up, even

have them hold a mock election and

413

:

choose was like, let's say five or six.

414

:

Let's say there's 25 people in the class.

415

:

Choose five or six people that are

gonna be the government and the other

416

:

people are gonna be the people, right?

417

:

And the government, they have to war game.

418

:

Things are gonna do, like we

gotta fund a war against so

419

:

and so we need to raise money.

420

:

We're gonna sell bonds.

421

:

We gotta have this much interest rate.

422

:

Our people are producing this

much money with the economy.

423

:

We're gonna have to recruit

five of you to be soldiers.

424

:

So we're gonna send you off to war.

425

:

Let's say two of you die, and we,

all right, we're running outta money.

426

:

We gotta sell more bonds, oh

we gotta pay off our debts.

427

:

We're gonna print more money.

428

:

And you could create like a real world

scenario that would give kids a much, a

429

:

better understanding of the way that the

government works and the way the policy

430

:

and the economy interact with each other.

431

:

Much better than what you get with the

education system the way it is right now.

432

:

Because I don't think I knew what

a bond was until I was probably 30.

433

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

434

:

Yeah.

435

:

Reed: that word all the time, but

436

:

you don't know what it, you

don't really know what it is.

437

:

Jerremy: No clue.

438

:

No clue.

439

:

And

440

:

I

441

:

think in you

442

:

mentioned it really well, man you

said the word high school a few

443

:

times, so did I, but I think that's

probably the time for it, right?

444

:

Like I don't think you

need to be berating.

445

:

You can talk very basic election

principles and some history stuff

446

:

in middle school, but I think high

school is the time for it because

447

:

when you turn 18 in this country,

you have the ability to vote, not the

448

:

right, as we mentioned a couple times.

449

:

It's weird, but alright, that's fine.

450

:

But yeah, you turn 18 man, boom.

451

:

Now you can vote.

452

:

And to your point, man,

you don't remember that?

453

:

'cause I don't think it happened homie.

454

:

We don't remember 'cause

it didn't really occur.

455

:

Dave: Wait.

456

:

Jerremy: didn't really have

tons and tons of information.

457

:

Again, just the real world thing.

458

:

The applications that impact this country.

459

:

Taxes.

460

:

We didn't learn how to fill out taxes.

461

:

We didn't learn what taxes.

462

:

We don't know anything about taxes.

463

:

When you exit high school, for the

majority of all people that go through

464

:

high school, you do not learn properly.

465

:

What are taxes?

466

:

Why do you pay them?

467

:

How much are you paying?

468

:

And how can you legally pay less?

469

:

You're not taught these things.

470

:

Every single person on earth is a

subject to learning a better education.

471

:

And here in the US I think that

just some of these basic life

472

:

principles just get way overlooked.

473

:

And we don't spend any, again if my

son Gabriel wants to become, which

474

:

I know he doesn't an architect,

some type of engineer, a chemist.

475

:

He can start learning some of the things

he's learning right now in high school.

476

:

Otherwise they should be

burning into his brain.

477

:

How elections work, how money

works, how income works, how

478

:

budgeting works, how taxes work.

479

:

Again, yes, parents should and can

teach that and my kids are gonna

480

:

be fine, but for every other kid in

the world, I think it's just really

481

:

crucial that they learn this stuff and

it's really just openly not taught.

482

:

And so I think that'd be

fantastic, man, that, that game,

483

:

the gamification of it, right?

484

:

Frequently doing that often where people

know and they just pour into themselves

485

:

and just get really in, ingrained into it.

486

:

Dave: I, I you guys are blowing my mind.

487

:

I'm not that much older than you all,

but I did I did learn all of that.

488

:

Like we had Model un, we

had government debates.

489

:

We I, we didn't learn about

taxes, but definitely about

490

:

banking and how money works.

491

:

I learned that in grade

school, so I, I'm like, what?

492

:

What took up all that time?

493

:

What did they get rid of?

494

:

What did they

495

:

add in order

496

:

to get rid of all

497

:

that?

498

:

Reed: We had, I remember learning about

the gold standard,:

499

:

campaigned against against fiat currency.

500

:

'cause he was a big gold guy.

501

:

But we, it wasn't really they didn't

really explain I don't feel like

502

:

I really learned how a fiat system

worked coming out of high school.

503

:

Like you, you knew a

little bit of details.

504

:

Like we got off the gold standard, we

tarted the Federal Reserve in:

505

:

and I, we didn't really get off the

gold standard until Nixon, I think.

506

:

But you don't really know what that means.

507

:

You don't really know the basis

for how the economy works.

508

:

You just, you have these kind

of vague details in your head,

509

:

like what's the gold standard?

510

:

What are we on now as

opposed to the gold standard?

511

:

Jerremy: Yeah, it is it is quite

fascinating, the things that we learn,

512

:

the things that we study, the things

they put a lot of importance on.

513

:

I met Dave with most of my

most of Gabe's teachers.

514

:

And I remember the English

teacher, just asking her like,

515

:

Hey books you guys are reading.

516

:

And she's I got these three books.

517

:

I just gotta get we gotta get through 'em.

518

:

I'm like who's dictating these books?

519

:

She's I'm, from the higher ups I gotta,

we gotta get through this, these books.

520

:

And like it is just like this

information that gets taught.

521

:

Yeah, exactly.

522

:

It is, man.

523

:

It's wild.

524

:

But I think that there's just such

a fun and unique and cool topic

525

:

because I do think, and again, my,

I think my general consensus leads

526

:

towards voting should be easier.

527

:

It should be safer, and

should be more informed.

528

:

And I think if those, when I say safer,

just safer in the sense that it's

529

:

available, it's easy, it's accessible.

530

:

People know it, people are aware of

it, and it's not something that's

531

:

extremely easily manipulated,

like what's happening right now.

532

:

And I think that's pretty,

pretty straightforward, right?

533

:

Don't manipulate elections.

534

:

Let's have a, let's actually hear what

the general population believe and

535

:

think on average what is the consensus

536

:

Dave: Oh

537

:

Jerremy: and find,

538

:

Dave: I got another one

to throw in there for you.

539

:

Jerremy: Oh, hit me, dude.

540

:

What What we got.

541

:

Dave: You can't run for anything

until 90 days before the election.

542

:

There's already people like lining up to

run for president three years from now.

543

:

I'm like, oh, enough of this.

544

:

No, I don't want to hear anything until 90

days before or else you're disqualified.

545

:

No ads,

546

:

no nothing.

547

:

Reed: I think compressing it

into a tight window like that.

548

:

Wouldn't really serve the purpose of

having a more educated voter pool.

549

:

I get what you're saying about, it's

ridiculous how it basically never

550

:

ends, but that's, you need these

ideas to marinate in order to have any

551

:

kind of filtering down to the general

552

:

population.

553

:

And even then, I don't, there's not a

whole lot of filtering down happening.

554

:

Dave: Fair.

555

:

I also think it's more noise than signal,

556

:

Reed: yeah.

557

:

When do you

558

:

guys think about the people who

559

:

are very supportive of voter ID laws?

560

:

How would they

561

:

feel about mandatory voting?

562

:

Jerremy: they I think the majority of

'em will be very pro mandatory voting.

563

:

'cause then it was like,

listen, you have to vote.

564

:

And when you have to vote,

you have to show an id.

565

:

Simple as that.

566

:

I think that would be their I, don't know.

567

:

I think that'd probably be their stance.

568

:

I wouldn't, I don't think I'd

ever sign off on mandatory

569

:

voting, at least in this country.

570

:

But again, man, I think it could

be a relatively simplistic approach

571

:

where it's not that extreme.

572

:

Like you don't have to have a passport,

you don't have to have a driver's license.

573

:

Like you can get a id.

574

:

Essentially for free.

575

:

I believe just like I am a

human being that lives in this

576

:

country and I'm a citizen.

577

:

I think that Id doesn't cost very much.

578

:

Especially if you live in cities that

have incredible transportation, right?

579

:

Like big cities, New York City, you

don't need a driver's license, right?

580

:

And if you don't have a passport,

that's fine, but library

581

:

card, like, what can you get?

582

:

Like

583

:

Dave: costco card.

584

:

Yeah.

585

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

586

:

What can you actually get?

587

:

That's pretty easy.

588

:

That's pretty simple.

589

:

And I think that there could be tons

of places if they said, Hey, listen,

590

:

you have to have a voter, ID got it.

591

:

Every CVS, every Walgreens, every

Walmart, every Kroger, every place

592

:

that you walk into every library,

they have a free, go ahead and take

593

:

this picture and we'll give you an id.

594

:

That wouldn't

595

:

be that

596

:

difficult.

597

:

Alex: We've mapped out the gerrymandering

pitfalls and spotlighted tech-savvy ways

598

:

to level the field, but true change starts

with what we teach the next generation.

599

:

In the final segment, Reed dives

into how education gaps fuel

600

:

these issues—and explores AI's

wild role in tomorrow's politics.

601

:

You won't want to miss

how it all ties together.

Show artwork for Solving America's Problems

About the Podcast

Solving America's Problems
Solving America’s Problems isn’t just a podcast—it’s a journey. Co-host Jerremy Newsome, a successful entrepreneur and educator, is pursuing his lifelong dream of running for president. Along the way, he and co-host Dave Conley bring together experts, advocates, and everyday Americans to explore the real, actionable solutions our country needs.

With dynamic formats—one-on-one interviews, panel discussions, and more—we cut through the noise of divisive rhetoric to uncover practical ideas that unite instead of divide. If you’re ready to think differently, act boldly, and join a movement for meaningful change, subscribe now.