Episode 93

full
Published on:

5th Aug 2025

The $240,000 Problem: How Immigration Fees Create Indentured Servants

The hidden costs of America's immigration system go far beyond government fees. Melissa Harms reveals how prevailing wage requirements force companies to pay H-1B workers $240,000 while laying off Americans earning half that. Employees become trapped in "indentured servitude" for decades, unable to change jobs or leave the country. From Hong Kong labs replacing American research to families separated by 12-year green card waits, this episode exposes the human cost of bureaucratic incompetence.

Timestamps:

  • (00:00) Employer Challenges and Costs: The True Price Tag
  • (04:49) Penalties and Legal Risks: When Following Rules Isn't Enough
  • (08:43) The Green Card Process: 12-Year Waits for Indian Nationals
  • (13:22) Fee Increases and Funding Issues: Where Does the Money Go?


📢 Solving America’s Problems Podcast – Real Solutions For Real Issues

🎧 Listen on  Apple | Spotify | & More!

🌍 Join the conversation on Instagram | YouTubeX

Transcript
Alex:

Picking up from the visa system's wild ride, today Melissa breaks down the

2

:

steep employer costs—like that company

forced to open a Hong Kong lab—and the

3

:

human side, with kids fearing deportation.

4

:

That's the real price tag

on our broken policies.

5

:

Jerremy Newsome: And so you also teach

HR professionals about immigration.

6

:

What are the common misconceptions

they hold about, the process or

7

:

any individuals that might really

hurt the ability to hire talent?

8

:

Melissa Harms: This kind of comes back

to you shouldn't need me, but you do.

9

:

One of the things I tell them

is, before you hire anybody.

10

:

We have certain questions you

can ask without violating any

11

:

discrimination laws about whether

or not the person needs sponsorship.

12

:

So before you hire somebody, come to

me and I have them give me the resume,

13

:

the job description, and the salary.

14

:

We also have a short questionnaire.

15

:

We ask anybody who says they need

sponsorship to fill out so I can make

16

:

sure there's a visa that works because

there's a lot of times where they

17

:

wanna hire somebody and say, I'm sorry.

18

:

There's just nothing we

can do for that person.

19

:

So that's the first thing I

tell HR people is just talk to

20

:

me before you extend an offer.

21

:

And that, and it's also comes to

educating them on what can be done

22

:

for people and what the costs are.

23

:

A lot of times they don't

realize how much this costs.

24

:

And I find myself in many occasions,

talking them out of hiring somebody

25

:

because the costs are so high, they're

not gonna be able to keep them for long.

26

:

The chances are low that their

case is gonna get approved.

27

:

I think just having an open dialogue

with an immigration attorney is

28

:

probably the first thing they can learn.

29

:

Dave Conley: And so everybody pays, right?

30

:

So the worker is in this place of

uncertainty for sometimes years.

31

:

The businesses have to pay all these fees

and they're stuck in this uncertainty.

32

:

Am I gonna have this person?

33

:

Am I not?

34

:

this is, none of this could

actually help businesses, right?

35

:

There's no upside to this.

36

:

Is there?

37

:

Melissa Harms: no.

38

:

There really isn't.

39

:

And we have people who

aren't selected the lottery.

40

:

These students, some of

these are PhDs from Stanford.

41

:

I had a situation with one of my

biotech clients several years ago where

42

:

the individual just didn't get the h.

43

:

She had been here in F1 after her PhD,

so she had to move back to, I think they

44

:

moved her to Hong Kong where they had an

office, opened a lab there for her, and

45

:

then hired all the lab workers in Hong

Kong that they would've hired in the

46

:

US if she could run her lab in the us.

47

:

But because she could not get a

degree or could not get an H one B,

48

:

we couldn't, she couldn't work here.

49

:

So those are some of the things, what

we're seeing now with the current

50

:

administration, there is something

called an Extraordinary Ability

51

:

visa that we use for a lot of these

scientists and highly trained workers.

52

:

And we're seeing U-S-C-I-S crack

down on those and say, this

53

:

person isn't extraordinary, or.

54

:

This work is not the national interest.

55

:

Under Biden there was a sort of

streamlined approach to this, what

56

:

we call a national interest waiver

which is a green card application

57

:

for people in the STEM fields.

58

:

And basically if you could prove that

your work was the national interest and

59

:

you had a PhD in the STEM field, it was

an expedited route to this green card.

60

:

I filed one for somebody who has a PhD

in chemical engineering and he's worked

61

:

at a biotech company for many years.

62

:

He has whole departments reporting

to him and they just said he

63

:

wasn't extraordinary enough.

64

:

So in the last 12 months, we've

seen this national interest waiver

65

:

applications go down the tubes as well.

66

:

I think the Biden administration

had the interest of promoting the

67

:

economy and promoting innovation

and entrepreneurship in mind.

68

:

I don't know what the current

administration has in mind, honestly.

69

:

Jerremy Newsome: I've heard

people say that before.

70

:

Melissa Harms: Yeah.

71

:

That was about as diplomatic

as I could put it, right?

72

:

Jerremy Newsome: That was nice.

73

:

I like that diplomacy.

74

:

So in regards to what you kinda mentioned,

like the different, graduates that

75

:

are getting specific degrees, you see

some that are outside of the STEM that

76

:

people should or could focus more on

77

:

Melissa Harms: I think particularly

with your entrepreneurs now, some

78

:

business schools, and I do work with,

a business school here in the Bay Area.

79

:

Many of the top tier business schools

have been able to get their programs

80

:

designated as STEM programs with a

business degree, which is fantastic.

81

:

'cause then their graduates

get that three years.

82

:

But I'm not sure how long that will last.

83

:

I'm always scared to point out the

good things because somebody will

84

:

listen to this and shut 'em down.

85

:

But, if that changes, I think we have

a real hole for entrepreneurs and

86

:

we had an international entrepreneur

rule that was so complicated and

87

:

convoluted that immigration attorneys

just wouldn't even touch it.

88

:

But we need something for the people

who are building the economy and

89

:

our entrepreneurs out there, that

may not have a STEM degree but

90

:

are still, fantastic individuals

who are going to contribute jobs.

91

:

I think everything should be

geared towards job creation.

92

:

And there are many visas that

have been but it's not the

93

:

way the economy works now.

94

:

So we need an economist to come in

and say, how can we simulate the

95

:

US economy through immigration?

96

:

Dave Conley: Tell me a little

bit about the penalties.

97

:

Certainly if you're here undocumented,

particularly in areas like

98

:

construction or farming or service

level jobs, and you're undocumented.

99

:

There isn't that big of a penalty.

100

:

They keep on doing it.

101

:

I happen to live in Florida.

102

:

It's one of the few states that

mandate, like E-Verify to hire people.

103

:

But when it comes to legal,

immigration, people going through

104

:

this process, what's the downside

to a business saying, ah, screw it.

105

:

We're just going to keep this person here.

106

:

We're just gonna keep

going in this process.

107

:

Melissa Harms: It's a, that's

a complicated question.

108

:

There are a number of different

types of penalties based on that.

109

:

If you had somebody who was an H one B

and you knew that their h had expired

110

:

and you didn't care, you just hired them.

111

:

You have the basic i nine penalties.

112

:

But then you have, if there's a

knowing violation you can attach

113

:

even criminal penalties, not only the

company, but to the HR representative.

114

:

So there are a number of different it

depends on what the degree of malicious.

115

:

Intent was as to what

your penalties could be.

116

:

But the simple I nine penalties

quite frankly are not that high.

117

:

I don't have them in front of me, but

we're talking hundreds of thousands

118

:

of dollars, which is a drop in the

bucket for a lot of these companies.

119

:

I think the bigger issue and I think

you might be reading these reports

120

:

and I'm not like, these are not

usually my type of clients 'cause I'm

121

:

working with more, people who are.

122

:

Doing highly skilled workers and they

don't have a lot of undocumented workers.

123

:

But you'll look at these.

124

:

I just read an article in New York

Times yesterday about a meat processing

125

:

plant in, I think it was IL or somewhere

that had been rated and lost 70% of

126

:

the workforce who was using E-Verify.

127

:

So you know this, and in the owner of

the company has always been Republican.

128

:

He voted, he actually voted in

:

129

:

potential impact on his workers

for these immigration wa raids.

130

:

And he's gonna have to shut down

because he is lost 70% of his workforce.

131

:

So that I think is what has a lot

of those type of employers running.

132

:

Scared is not so much the penalties

they'll face, but if they're rated,

133

:

what's gonna happen to their workforce

because they rely on those workers.

134

:

Jerremy Newsome: Yeah.

135

:

Makes sense.

136

:

You're talking about the scale, some

of the companies just describe that.

137

:

Is there certain companies that are just

demoralized by all of this happening

138

:

and that have to have current employers

here that just simply cannot go and

139

:

find any immigrants to come over?

140

:

Melissa Harms: Again, these really

aren't the clients I'm working for.

141

:

But I think if you look in the

restaurants and the agricultural

142

:

fields, manufacturing, that's where

you're gonna see the hardest hit.

143

:

I'm very close to Napa Valley and I think

that, you're gonna see a lot of these

144

:

agricultural workers in Napa be affected.

145

:

I think the fear is a really big part of

146

:

What's happening now.

147

:

There are certain companies or certain.

148

:

I know wineries people just don't

show up 'cause they're scared

149

:

that ICE is gonna show up there.

150

:

There's all sorts of websites that

track where ICE is and people are

151

:

scared to go into those communities

where they know ICE is going to be.

152

:

And, on a personal level I see these

kids, these high school kids, or I have

153

:

high school children, but these kids

who are scared about their parents being

154

:

deported, what is that gonna do to me?

155

:

That's a whole other

sector from what I do.

156

:

But I think what, my employers and my

clients are facing is how are we gonna

157

:

get the talent we need and how do we

continue to be innovative and develop

158

:

the drugs that we wanna develop or,

come up with these new technologies

159

:

without the best and the brightest.

160

:

And America's starting to sound

like a place that doesn't welcome

161

:

the best and the brightest.

162

:

Dave Conley: It's not, it's

something I had from a personal.

163

:

Somebody in my life was that their visa

was through their employer and in a

164

:

way, she was trapped with the employer.

165

:

Melissa Harms: Yes.

166

:

Dave Conley: So tell me about that.

167

:

And what are some of the downsides

to having this employee based

168

:

Melissa Harms: Yeah.

169

:

That's hard, it's almost indentured

servitude because you get hired

170

:

by this employer and the life

cycle of a foreign worker.

171

:

They're hired maybe as a

student with that OPT and then

172

:

they get they H one B lottery.

173

:

They work with the employer.

174

:

Now they can go work for another employer.

175

:

But that new employer has to do the h

again, they don't have to go through the

176

:

lottery, but they have to pay all those

ridiculous fees we just talked about.

177

:

So that's what they have to

do if they leave companies.

178

:

Now, the scary part for them

is what if they get laid off?

179

:

They don't have a job anymore.

180

:

They essentially have a 60 day

grace period to find a new job

181

:

without having to leave the us.

182

:

Which, if you're a senior level

person, that's just not easily done.

183

:

So that's very scary.

184

:

And then, the other side of this is

that if they wanna stay here past

185

:

that six years, so you get a total

of six years in H one B status.

186

:

If you wanna stay here, if you start

having kids here and you develop

187

:

your professional network here.

188

:

You have to have the company file a

green card for you and you talk about

189

:

archaic, where, I could get into that.

190

:

But that's where the company

has to recruit and prove there's

191

:

a shortage of US workers.

192

:

And they have all these things

they have to do, these recruitment

193

:

steps they have to take.

194

:

One of which is putting two Sunday

newspaper ads, which if you'll go pick

195

:

up a Sunday newspaper, the Chronicle

or wherever you are, New York Times

196

:

has them, I would say 80% of those

newspaper help wanted ads are for

197

:

the green card process for a foreign

national, because they have to be done.

198

:

No, I'm serious because I

know what they look like.

199

:

We have to write 'em a certain way

so I can pick up the newspaper.

200

:

I'm like that's a perma.

201

:

That's a perma.

202

:

That's a perma.

203

:

So they have to go out and

recruit for this position.

204

:

And then once they go through this.

205

:

Really two year process of just getting

the thing on file or getting it approved.

206

:

They have more steps.

207

:

They have to wait for a green card

number to come up because we have only a

208

:

certain number of green cards per year.

209

:

Like we have H one Bs per year.

210

:

So they're waiting and waiting

and the whole time they're

211

:

stuck with that employer.

212

:

They do get to a certain point

very far in the process where they

213

:

could change employers, but it's

years and years down the line.

214

:

So now that they've had this employer

file for them and spend all this

215

:

money and get this approved to a

certain point, they're still stuck

216

:

with that employer and that job.

217

:

That job has to remained

somewhat the same.

218

:

You can allow for a little bit of career

progression, but if you get hired as a.

219

:

Analyst and now you're

running the whole department.

220

:

That's a completely different job and you

need now a whole new recruitment process

221

:

and proving shortage and all of that.

222

:

So that's where it gets really bad.

223

:

And that's where you really talk

about the indenture servitude.

224

:

'cause these employees have to stay with

the same employer for so many years.

225

:

Dave Conley: And she couldn't like at

some point in the process, like she

226

:

wasn't allowed to leave the United

States for years, and then she needed all

227

:

these like invasive like medical tests.

228

:

And I'm like, oh, come on.

229

:

Is that real?

230

:

Melissa Harms: yeah.

231

:

We have to, they have to do medical exams.

232

:

There's a certain period of time where

they can't leave because of certain

233

:

paperwork we're filing if they don't

have an underlying non-immigrant visa.

234

:

I find it hilarious that we've

got, this health and human services

235

:

secretary who doesn't want vaccines,

but our four nationals have to have

236

:

three COVID vaccines and everything

else under the sun before they

237

:

can become a green card holder.

238

:

So it's, yeah, it is a very long, very

expensive process from start to finish.

239

:

Just to give you an idea on the, and this

is something that shocks a lot of people

240

:

for these employment-based green cards.

241

:

So if you're being sponsored by

an employer and you don't have a

242

:

family member to sponsor you we

have that, I think it's 144,000

243

:

per year only for green cards.

244

:

And it's broken down by country of

birth and your preference category.

245

:

And so the country of birth was that

we wanted to have a diverse country.

246

:

So we don't want one single country

to, to have all the green cards, right?

247

:

So the countries with the highest

demand have the longest waits.

248

:

So if you're from China, for example,

right now the visa bullets and

249

:

that we get every month, if you're

from China actually India's worse.

250

:

So if you're from India you could

be waiting 12 years for a grain card

251

:

If your employer sponsors you.

252

:

Yeah.

253

:

Jerremy Newsome: whoa.

254

:

Melissa Harms: So it's,

it's just a crazy system.

255

:

And it also seems very unfair.

256

:

'cause you're from India and you wait

12 years, but if you were born in

257

:

Pakistan, you wait a year and a half.

258

:

And that's all based on demand.

259

:

That's the whole point.

260

:

And there's been a lot of different

proposals in Congress to eliminate

261

:

the per country limitations.

262

:

None of which have succeeded.

263

:

Nothing succeeds in Congress about

immigration anymore, but this one has

264

:

been one that a lot of people have

advocated for, to make it more fair.

265

:

But yeah it's definitely a broken system.

266

:

Jerremy Newsome: Just dancing

around that for a second.

267

:

The latest federal spending

bill had major fee increases.

268

:

Do you see any of these rising costs

throughout the system affecting

269

:

more Visa business sponsorships?

270

:

Melissa Harms: Yeah, the Visa

fees went up dramatically.

271

:

In 2024, there was a new fee increase.

272

:

And we have now we have a $600 asylum

fee that's added on to every single

273

:

case we file 300 if you're from a small

employer that has less than 26 employees.

274

:

That was completely new.

275

:

That was supposedly to fund

the asylum program, and this

276

:

is just for H one B workers.

277

:

And then the fees themselves went

up, I think 70% for an H one B.

278

:

So the fees have gone up dramatically.

279

:

Like I said, a lot of these

employers really need these people.

280

:

So that Delta was not enough to

dissuade them just from the filing

281

:

fees when you're talking H one Bs.

282

:

But, I think the fees just

incredibly start to get more and

283

:

more unbearable as things progress.

284

:

Jerremy Newsome: Yeah.

285

:

Melissa Harms: it's expensive.

286

:

Jerremy Newsome: Yep.

287

:

Dave Conley: fees go?

288

:

Do they fund what is it, the U-S-C-I-S

or what, or they just go into the ether?

289

:

Melissa Harms: So the, there's a filing

fee that's supposed to just fund the

290

:

cost of adjudicating the petition.

291

:

U-S-C-A-S is supposedly self-sufficient.

292

:

It's supposed to generate its own fees.

293

:

Then there's a fee, there's a $500

fraud fee, which is what it's called.

294

:

And that goes to this FDNS

unit, which is fraud detection,

295

:

national security, I think.

296

:

And they go out actually, and

this is a very active unit.

297

:

They go out to employers and will

say, okay, you filed an H one B

298

:

petition on behalf of Joe Schmo.

299

:

I wanna talk to Joe Schmo and

make sure he's doing what you

300

:

said he did in the petition.

301

:

And I've had many of my clients have

been visited by those fraud officers

302

:

and that $500 fee funds that department.

303

:

We've never had a problem with the fraud

officers because as I'm lucky to have

304

:

clients who are actually employing people

in the capacity that they say they are.

305

:

And then there's a $1,500 education

retraining fee that is supposed

306

:

to go back into US education.

307

:

I've never, really tracked that fund

that's part of the H one B fees.

308

:

But that was the intent of that

was let's educate US workers so

309

:

they can do these jobs that we're

getting forward workers to do.

310

:

And that's actually one of my

personal feelings about the whole

311

:

process is that we do need to look

at our education system because we're

312

:

not churning out the science, the

employees that our employers need.

313

:

So there should be a better look

at our education systems and.

314

:

I can get on my high horse, California

and its schools and how expensive it is

315

:

to go to the California universities and

how hard it is to get into a University

316

:

of California or even a Cal State School.

317

:

They need to look at giving more money

to education here in the us for sure.

318

:

Jerremy Newsome: Or at

least doing it correctly.

319

:

Melissa Harms: Yes.

320

:

Jerremy Newsome: Yeah,

321

:

Melissa Harms: Yeah.

322

:

Jerremy Newsome: lot of money.

323

:

I mean that, that was why

Dave, me and Dave asked that

324

:

question once in an episode.

325

:

Where's the money going?

326

:

Melissa Harms: Oh, it is a,

it's a, and let's trace it.

327

:

I'd love to see where,

all those H one B fees go.

328

:

Yeah.

329

:

Our government is really good about

being transparent in immigration.

330

:

Let me tell you that.

331

:

Jerremy Newsome: Oh, the best

we're number one for sure.

332

:

Alex: From massive fines to families

torn apart, this segment hits

333

:

hard on immigration's hidden toll.

334

:

But solutions are coming—tomorrow,

we explore reforms, AI fixes, and

335

:

shifting to an abundance mindset.

336

:

You won't want to miss

how we turn this around.

Show artwork for Solving America's Problems

About the Podcast

Solving America's Problems
Solving America’s Problems isn’t just a podcast—it’s a journey. Co-host Jerremy Newsome, a successful entrepreneur and educator, is pursuing his lifelong dream of running for president. Along the way, he and co-host Dave Conley bring together experts, advocates, and everyday Americans to explore the real, actionable solutions our country needs.

With dynamic formats—one-on-one interviews, panel discussions, and more—we cut through the noise of divisive rhetoric to uncover practical ideas that unite instead of divide. If you’re ready to think differently, act boldly, and join a movement for meaningful change, subscribe now.