Episode 173

full
Published on:

12th Feb 2026

Why do veterans self-harm double after VA cuts?

Veterans face a fatal lag in support. Self-harm attempts doubled after a 67% cut to Veterans Administration funding. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley talk with former Congresswoman Marie Newman. She pushes for proactive health and wellness aid for vets. They cover system inefficiencies, political corruption, and ways to cut money's influence. Discussions hit on economic gaps too.

Timestamps:

  1. (00:00) Veterans need preemptive care – self-harm doubled since 67% VA cuts
  2. (06:15) Government wastes resources – inefficiencies drive up veteran suffering
  3. (10:21) Money poisons decisions – financial ties block fair veteran aid
  4. (11:24) Donations warp policy – corruption lets veteran needs lag behind
  5. (12:22) Courts favor insiders – rules protect power over public good
  6. (13:27) Conflicts erode trust – politicians' ties hurt veteran support
  7. (14:13) Stock education shapes views – personal paths reveal system flaws
  8. (15:17) Congress trades stocks freely – bans could cut economic inequity
  9. (19:01) Wealth gaps hit hardest – inequity fuels veteran health crises

Connect:

  1. Marie NewmanWebsite | Bluesky | Facebook | Instagram | Substack

🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X

🎧 Listen to Episodes → Here

Transcript
Alex:

A country can buy weapons fast—and help slow.

2

:

Congresswoman Marie Newman argues

that mismatch is fatal for veterans

3

:

and for anyone on the edge.

4

:

The real question isn’t “more

laws”—it’s whether support

5

:

arrives before the impulse does.

6

:

Marie Newman: We do have to get those

folks particularly our veterans to a

7

:

health and wellness place that is free.

8

:

I'm gonna get political and I'm

sorry, I know we have all stripes

9

:

here, but I'm just gonna say it.

10

:

When this president took away 67%

of the Veterans Administration

11

:

budget, that was super ef.

12

:

Because now we have the veterans.

13

:

Already in one year, we have seen

the rate of veterans trying to

14

:

hurt themselves or kill themselves.

15

:

More than double inside of one year.

16

:

So you're right, Dave.

17

:

Stop creating wars and we've created

nine in the last 13 months, we've

18

:

created nine wars that are not resolved.

19

:

And we have veterans across the world,

away from their families, wrong.

20

:

We have veterans that feel badly about

themselves because a number of reasons.

21

:

They get it from all sides.

22

:

They get it from the side of

Hey, go shoot and kill people.

23

:

And then in the military,

they, propagate that.

24

:

Now that said, there's a lot

of amazing military people that

25

:

understand the gravity of death

and teach them great things.

26

:

There's a few that.

27

:

Don't teach great things, right?

28

:

So largely I'm a huge fan of our military.

29

:

Sometimes just like in any industry,

you get a bad apple here and there.

30

:

So we do have to do something

particularly, and I would

31

:

start with veterans.

32

:

So you have to start with a, again, back

to my dorky management consulting days.

33

:

Start with a pilot program.

34

:

So start with veterans because it

is the that group has the Perla.

35

:

Plurality, sorry.

36

:

It's early.

37

:

The plurality of problems within

that writ large group, right?

38

:

So let's start that pilot program

with them and lift them up and

39

:

get them to a healthier spot.

40

:

And that again, needs to be a robust 360.

41

:

So for me, what I would do if we look

at just the dorky government of IT

42

:

stuff, administrative stuff is create.

43

:

A section in the VA that addresses

this veterans interaction with

44

:

firearms, from the get go.

45

:

I think that's a good starting point.

46

:

But there are other areas too where

you can, so in areas an interesting,

47

:

the uptick in rural suicides because

what we do to our farmers is awful.

48

:

And the uptick around youth that don't

have opportunities in rural areas,

49

:

that uptick is a, is indexing at 127%.

50

:

So it isn't just urban and

suburban, it is very much rural.

51

:

And just so you know, per capita

rural, 'cause we have far fewer

52

:

Americans that live in rural areas.

53

:

It's like hovering around 30%.

54

:

There's been some engagement with firearm

that they potentially hurt themselves.

55

:

So that's really significant.

56

:

So we do have to have problem, we

have to do some problem solving

57

:

around that demographic that feel as

though and it's particularly in the

58

:

Gen ZI have two Gen Z kids, right?

59

:

One of them just got a job after six

months of being out of work and another.

60

:

Got was part of this layoff

from the tariffs, right?

61

:

With a fortune 50 company.

62

:

And so we have to address

the economic piece of it too.

63

:

So people our kids that are Gen

Z and some millennials can feel

64

:

like they can get equity and buy

a home and all the things, right?

65

:

Again, I wish there was

one intervention, but we

66

:

can do a couple of small scale

pilots right, right away.

67

:

We could do that.

68

:

Right now the federal

government has lots of power.

69

:

They could do that right now, today they

could start and they have the experts that

70

:

would do it on all sides of the politics.

71

:

Jerremy: Since we're brainstorming,

walk us through that.

72

:

Walk us through that vision or that dream.

73

:

I'd love

74

:

Marie Newman: I mean it.

75

:

so let's play the veterans

Administration piece out.

76

:

So right now you could take money from

the DOD budget, which is, was re it's the

77

:

largest it's ever been by a factor of two.

78

:

Just take I don't know,

what would it take?

79

:

A hundred billion.

80

:

Jerremy: Dave, this is what, dear, this

is what I've been saying for years.

81

:

Dude.

82

:

Sorry.

83

:

Keep going.

84

:

Marie Newman: Take a hundred billion

and build a real veterans exit program.

85

:

This is the problem.

86

:

When we, when our veterans come

home, we treat them like crap.

87

:

We do.

88

:

I have relatives that were and none

of them, and I, full disclosure,

89

:

my, my relatives did not see combat.

90

:

But we still, you would be amazed at

veterans that don't even see combat and

91

:

have been isolated for two years in some

weird place that is antithetical to their

92

:

upbringing and they, that screws them up.

93

:

We forget all the ways in

which we screw up our veterans.

94

:

So if we did an exit program.

95

:

You could lay I don't know,

7 billion on that and get a

96

:

really robust program going.

97

:

Jerremy: Totally.

98

:

Yeah.

99

:

Marie Newman: and by the way, the

other problem we have with our veterans

100

:

is that while I think 70 million

veterans have been part of the army,

101

:

had a tour, blah, blah, blah, there's

another probably 30 to 50 million close

102

:

relatives that are affected by this too.

103

:

Sometimes spouses and kids kill

themselves as relative to the trauma.

104

:

'cause the trauma is in the home and it's

in your central nervous system, right?

105

:

So if we did a, an exit

106

:

program for veterans, I think that's

a really good place to start, right?

107

:

And give them job training.

108

:

Give them mental health training.

109

:

Give them a safe place to live.

110

:

A safe place to talk about their trauma.

111

:

And all of those programs were taken

away in this administration and it

112

:

wasn't great before, by the way.

113

:

Biden didn't do a lot better, but

at least the programs were in place

114

:

and now we've taken that all away.

115

:

And now we're gonna see we're gonna have,

I'm just gonna predict, and I hate this

116

:

'cause it, I hate to be true, but I'm

a little older and I'm true sometimes.

117

:

We're gonna see a homeless

explosion in the veteran population

118

:

because of what they've done to

the VA in the last 12 months.

119

:

Dave: We've and over the last year,

we've covered so many different

120

:

topics from veterans to we, we

did school shootings and safety.

121

:

We've done so many, so homelessness,

so many different topics.

122

:

The

123

:

thing that seems impenetrable, I, and

I'm gonna speak for both Jerremy and

124

:

myself, is where does the money go?

125

:

Like you were on I believe you were

on SBA and transportation committees.

126

:

Marie Newman: that's right.

127

:

Dave: I was a senior executive

in the government for a while.

128

:

Marie Newman: Yeah.

129

:

Dave: I couldn't bend a paperclip

for under a hundred thousand dollars.

130

:

This is whole.

131

:

I just, it is unfathomable to me

where, the size of the US budget,

132

:

how much we're spending on credit

card, the government credit card

133

:

and where the money actually goes.

134

:

So I, I hear you.

135

:

But the Veterans Administration

has a huge budget.

136

:

Like where do we lose the connection?

137

:

Where does the money, what?

138

:

Where's the black hole?

139

:

Marie Newman: The, so hospitals and

clinics and healthcare providers

140

:

are extraordinarily expensive.

141

:

That whole so Tricare, you're

probably familiar, Dave, 'cause

142

:

you've worked in the government.

143

:

TRICARE is the is the health insurance,

if you will, of the veteran community.

144

:

Tricare.

145

:

Runs by itself.

146

:

So it's like a mini Medicare.

147

:

So think of that, think of

the D, the duplication there.

148

:

We have Medicare, we have Medicaid.

149

:

And then we have Tricare.

150

:

What if that had one backend?

151

:

Back to my dorky days we had

one back office for all three of

152

:

those, and it was one single pair.

153

:

Then we'd solve a lot of problems.

154

:

So let's start there.

155

:

But, so just in terms of the cost

though, to help you understand, there's

156

:

duplicated back offices for all these

places, so it's a little bit like.

157

:

And you'll be surprised

'cause I'm a raging democrat.

158

:

For me to say this is that we

don't need all these townships and

159

:

we don't need a fire department

for a town that has 500 people.

160

:

Use your next door neighbors

161

:

for god's sakes.

162

:

Be efficient.

163

:

And yeah, the inefficiencies and

what, so for me, what's funny is that

164

:

Doge was absolutely wrong 'cause they

did the Eenie Minnie money Mo Okay.

165

:

Take all that out if it had been a bunch

of dorky management consultants like

166

:

me going and say, okay, what's working?

167

:

What's not working?

168

:

What's best practices?

169

:

Boom.

170

:

Cut this, cut that.

171

:

Go with this.

172

:

That would've been a good approach and

I would've been all in then, by the way,

173

:

because there is, you are right Dave.

174

:

There is there is, there's

not that much fraud, weirdly.

175

:

There's incompetence and there's

there's duplication, but there's

176

:

really not that much fraud.

177

:

So if they'd gone in and said, look,

let's just get merciless about this

178

:

and clean this thing up, that's fine.

179

:

But cutting social services.

180

:

Is now going to result in homelessness.

181

:

Our morbidity rate is

gonna get a lot worse.

182

:

Our mortality rate is

gonna get a lot worse.

183

:

Our public health is gonna get

a lot, everything gets worse.

184

:

So for me, the it would be the

first thing that I would do is

185

:

consolidate Tricare Medicaid Medicare

to one entity with one back office.

186

:

Jerremy: That seems like a pretty, I

know we said earlier that there's a

187

:

lot, not tons of things that can happen

quickly, but that seems like one of them.

188

:

Marie Newman: Oh, you could

look, Medicaid is set, or sorry.

189

:

Medicare is set up right now to

absorb the entire insurance industry.

190

:

We could do it in literally a series

of months and all the employees, by

191

:

the way, so no one loses their job.

192

:

So don't tell me this can't be done

because I have studied healthcare.

193

:

Just so you know.

194

:

I was a healthcare industry

analyst and studied it on

195

:

both sides for three decades.

196

:

Don't tell me it can't be done.

197

:

No, ma'am.

198

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

199

:

I can absolutely be,

that can happen for sure.

200

:

Especially, you pretty much outlined it.

201

:

Marie Newman: Yeah.

202

:

And I'm, and I've, look,

I'm the rea I'll be honest.

203

:

I'm working with a dear friend in

Congress who's thinking about running who.

204

:

Knows about the system as well.

205

:

Very well, and I'm, if he does run

for president I will support him.

206

:

So we're, I'm in his kitchen

cabinet and we'll see what happens.

207

:

But Yeah.

208

:

because I am very, there are two

things that I will do before I

209

:

die and I've got another 60 years.

210

:

I'm very healthy.

211

:

Jerremy: plenty.

212

:

Marie Newman: I wanna get money outta

politics and I want every human in

213

:

the US to have healthcare and period.

214

:

Jerremy: Yeah, I love that.

215

:

Those are two.

216

:

Without, we're definitely gonna have

to derail a little bit because one

217

:

of those is so near and dear to my

heart is the money outta politics.

218

:

To Dave's point and.

219

:

The money's everywhere.

220

:

It's always going.

221

:

No one knows why or where, who

has it, but none of the people

222

:

who need it are getting it.

223

:

And the people that need

it aren't having it.

224

:

And the people that have

it aren't giving it.

225

:

So it's kinda like where everyone

has it except the people who should

226

:

have getting money outta politics.

227

:

What would be an actual legitimate

step towards that happening?

228

:

Marie Newman: So we already have

something set up and ready to go.

229

:

Jerremy: Okay.

230

:

Marie Newman: There is a a bill called

the Anti-Corruption Act that there's

231

:

a congressman in California, his name

Ro Khana who put together, it would

232

:

take away 80% of Citizens United.

233

:

So quick for your listeners, not

necessarily for YouTube, but for your

234

:

listeners citizen United was a Supreme

Court decision that maintained that

235

:

corporations are allowed to fund.

236

:

Candidates and members of Congress and

any elected official to their heart's

237

:

content at any number because that's

your first amendment choice and they

238

:

deemed that corporations are people and

have a voice, gross, all of it, right?

239

:

So that's what we're dealing with.

240

:

Citizens United.

241

:

We cannot overturn Citizens United

until we have a different Supreme Court.

242

:

None of those babies are gonna die

for a long time, I hate to tell you.

243

:

And so those nine players, three

of them would vote to overturn

244

:

Citizens United right now.

245

:

Six would not.

246

:

So what do we do in place of that?

247

:

There's two things we can do.

248

:

We can do this anti-corruption

act, which doesn't require.

249

:

An overturn of a citizens unit.

250

:

It gets rid of superpacs, it gets

rid of independent expenditures.

251

:

It brings the individual donation

down to, I think 500 or a

252

:

thousand from the max out level.

253

:

And it get, gets rid of dark money.

254

:

And then if there are any un itemized

expenditures, and I'm not gonna

255

:

get in the weeds about the FEC, but

it makes everything transparent.

256

:

So it would solve about

80% of the problem.

257

:

And that has probably a hundred

signers right now, has one.

258

:

Republican, which is good.

259

:

The rest are Democrats, but all

of those Democrats and Republicans

260

:

that take money are like, oh, ah,

261

:

that's gonna be rougher for me.

262

:

Yikes.

263

:

So that would solve 80%

of the problem right away.

264

:

And then we could also do an

expansion, court expansion to make it.

265

:

Where the Supreme Court is 15 people.

266

:

And you get a much more balanced

approach to America because then

267

:

you could have independent thinkers,

you could have right, left, you

268

:

could have whatever you wanted.

269

:

And a different way to appoint them

versus an individual president,

270

:

Democrat, or Republican or independent.

271

:

It having the only say to it and then.

272

:

And then some rules around not this

nonsense that Mitch McConnell wouldn't

273

:

allow any of the Supreme Court

justice to get done during Obama.

274

:

That was ridiculous because it's very

clear in the House and Senate rules,

275

:

but whatever he did, what he did rules

around the Supreme Court would be helpful.

276

:

And then this anti-corruption

bill would be very helpful.

277

:

All by the way, it has teeth in it

too, which is what I screamed about

278

:

and I got in trouble with all of my

leadership all the time is because I'd

279

:

read the bill and I'd be like, no teeth.

280

:

No reinforcement.

281

:

No.

282

:

There's no watchdog group.

283

:

There's no, and be like,

oh, Marie, please be quiet.

284

:

Dave: Could, any of this be sassy?

285

:

I feel like we need

t-shirts on your website.

286

:

You're so sassy.

287

:

Could any of this be solved

with conflict of interest?

288

:

When in private industry, like I, if I did

anything with conflict of, in, interest

289

:

I could be like, in serious trouble.

290

:

Marie Newman: thing, David.

291

:

And yeah, so you're right

that we should do that.

292

:

It would give it a little bit, not

like they might think twice, but those

293

:

things are real hard to resolve in

court, as even in the, in, in business.

294

:

It's real hard to resolve in

court and it takes forever

295

:

and it's, so it's like an NDA.

296

:

It's only as good as the goodwill

coming from the signer, right?

297

:

I've been in those battles.

298

:

They seldom go your way, so it's

it, that's, I would rather the

299

:

teeth be real strong and real clear.

300

:

And there's a it's in the penal

coat, that's when it gets yummy.

301

:

Penal coat is yummy.

302

:

Dave: Laws.

303

:

Got it.

304

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

305

:

What about, the one for me.

306

:

Super quick background on me.

307

:

Congresswoman, I, my specialty has been

in stocks and options and trading and

308

:

investing, and I built and then sold

the third largest stock market education

309

:

company that educated people for free

on just how the stock market works.

310

:

Marie Newman: Oh God bless you.

311

:

Jerremy: Oh, thank you.

312

:

I spent tons of time going to schools

and colleges and just like middle

313

:

schools, kindergartens, like just

teaching kids how investing works and how

314

:

trading works and how the market works.

315

:

And I've always thought it

very interesting and one of the

316

:

components of that was for me.

317

:

The disallowing of individuals in

politics, Senate, or the Congress

318

:

or the House of Representatives to

invest into individual companies.

319

:

Because again, back to the back,

to the that's an obvious, right?

320

:

Marie Newman: Yeah.

321

:

There.

322

:

And there's a bill ready to go by the

way, that has 110 signers right now.

323

:

There's two Republicans on that.

324

:

God bless them.

325

:

And so that one is ready to go too,

that, I forget the house number on it,

326

:

but that is a bill that's ready to go.

327

:

So no one, I agree with you.

328

:

It's isn't it like such

common sense Jerremy, right?

329

:

Nobody should be able to

invest in a single company.

330

:

And by the way, I also would take

it a little further because right

331

:

now how it's set up.

332

:

As a member of Congress quarterly,

you have to do a report on

333

:

all your finances, right?

334

:

So have you sold a home?

335

:

Have you bought a home?

336

:

And if you are trading stock, you

have to list all of it individually.

337

:

What is the status of your mutual

fund, ETFs, all the things.

338

:

Do you have a trust, whatever,

like all those questions, right?

339

:

Some of them are late with them and they

think it's funny because there's no teeth.

340

:

Like they don't get, like if they

are late by a year or two, then

341

:

they get brought before ethics.

342

:

And then ethics is shame

on you, you're so bad.

343

:

And which is nothing, they all

violate the stock Act all the time.

344

:

'cause the Stock Act says that you

have to report everything, right?

345

:

So we have to get beyond that.

346

:

We have to have the Stock Act too, which

is this new bill that a hundred, we have

347

:

a hundred members of Congress signing onto

that would forbid all members of Congress

348

:

from trading individual stocks, all of

their families and all of their staff.

349

:

Then you do take away the

conflict back to Dave's comment.

350

:

So it would, and so you hit

the nail on the head again.

351

:

That one's ready to go.

352

:

It's just getting all these people that

and I'll give you a couple examples.

353

:

Nancy Pelosi entered Congress

in the late eighties, early

354

:

nineties, I can't remember.

355

:

And she had, I don't know, 10 million.

356

:

Now she has 300 million, right?

357

:

Marjorie Taylor Greene.

358

:

She started out her net

worth was under a million.

359

:

Now she has 23 million in six years.

360

:

So please.

361

:

Please tell me what's going on

here, folks, and the, and I'm just

362

:

picking on those two by the way

363

:

Dave: No, it, yeah.

364

:

Jerremy: Oh, there is a long list.

365

:

It's a

366

:

Marie Newman: Oh my God, it's, yeah,

I always laughed so hard because when

367

:

I was in Congress and I filled out all

my forms every quarter, my husband was

368

:

trading a couple of individual stocks

because it's part of our retirement.

369

:

But here's what I would say is that

I still supported the Ban, the Stock

370

:

Act, which was around when I was in

Congress, which is now three years ago.

371

:

Because.

372

:

I'm a good actor.

373

:

Like I sat on small

business and transportation.

374

:

I didn't own any transportation stocks.

375

:

No small business stocks.

376

:

Like I was very clear.

377

:

But I will tell you the, almost

the entire financial services

378

:

committee, Democrats, Republicans,

and independents, all trade stocks.

379

:

In the financial services

industry, so shame on them.

380

:

Disgusting.

381

:

And a conflict of interest.

382

:

And you do on financial, on the financial

services committee, you do hear things

383

:

on transportation and and small business.

384

:

We're always dealing with keeping

our union brothers and sisters

385

:

safe and keeping Americans safe on

transportation and on small business.

386

:

We're just trying to

bring their taxes down.

387

:

But on financial services and energy

and commerce, they hear so much.

388

:

I can't tell you.

389

:

Like it's disgusting.

390

:

So that's an infuriating.

391

:

So I'm with you, my brother.

392

:

Jerremy: And it's also very it's just

very I'm just trying to look for the right

393

:

word, but it's very calming for someone

to else hear and say that because it's.

394

:

On the in, on the outside

people that are looking in.

395

:

It's so obvious and so transparently

396

:

insane.

397

:

Marie Newman: it's 80% of Republicans

and 90% of Democrats all agree.

398

:

These people should not be

399

:

trading stocks, period.

400

:

Jerremy: Yes.

401

:

Yeah.

402

:

And getting back to the whole

money com money complexity.

403

:

That's really what it is.

404

:

Like it's money in politics.

405

:

And if you have money in politics,

money, you've heard how many times have

406

:

we heard the term money changes people.

407

:

And so when you start changing and

you're supposed to be representing

408

:

and you're supposed to be connecting

with and you're becoming too removed

409

:

from where you started and the whole

reason you started, and yeah, just

410

:

gonna become, create a big shift.

411

:

Marie Newman: yeah.

412

:

No, it's a I will tell you the one

lesson I learned and I wrote this

413

:

in my book that came out last year

almost in every chapter in some form.

414

:

I said, it's not just follow the money,

it's follow the people that are giving

415

:

the money and receiving the money.

416

:

And we do have to address

this at some point.

417

:

I it was, I was not popular in

Congress for a bunch of reasons,

418

:

but I was really pushing that, I

was pushing the anti-corruption act.

419

:

I was pushing the expand the court

Act because we can't address this.

420

:

It is the will to address it, and

it's, so that's what I I spend my

421

:

time doing now with my substack, is

I help people understand Congress

422

:

and why nothing ever gets done.

423

:

You do have control.

424

:

You.

425

:

The three of us have control and all

426

:

the other voters in the US have control.

427

:

And so don't vote for people

that take corporate PAC money.

428

:

Don't take, don't vote for people

that have bully Pac money from foreign

429

:

lobbies like APAC and Democratic

Majority for Israel and the like.

430

:

Don't vote for people that won't sign

on to the Anti-Corruption Act or the the

431

:

stock Act if they won't sign onto those.

432

:

That is a big red flag.

433

:

Jerremy: Big red flag.

434

:

Because again back from my, to my

background, I'm the stock tradings

435

:

expert and very familiar with it.

436

:

I'm not saying you can't

invest into markets.

437

:

I'm not saying you can't invest

into the US economy, but buy

438

:

an ETF, buy a mutual fund.

439

:

Buy something that you can't

individually can solely control,

440

:

own, operate, manipulate.

441

:

Marie Newman: And I think there should

be, in fairness, what I would add to,

442

:

with the amendment, I would add to the

current Stock Ban Act of individual stocks

443

:

within those mutual funds and within,

'cause you can model in there, right?

444

:

Like you can choose different models.

445

:

So like in an ETE there should be

rules around the ETF modeling and

446

:

the the individual transactions.

447

:

And that you can only do

it so often and it can't

448

:

be related to any of the, and you

can't, let's say if you sit on

449

:

transportation in your mutual fund,

you can't have United Airlines.

450

:

Jerremy: Yeah.

451

:

So something to that extent and to

your point, bank executives have to

452

:

do this all the time, by the way.

453

:

So if you work for a Citigroup, JP

Morgan, Goldman Sachs, like if you're

454

:

a higher up executive level, they're

banned from doing almost anything.

455

:

Marie Newman: Is not a new concept.

456

:

Jerremy: not at all.

457

:

It's just in politics.

458

:

Like they could do whatever they

want, but if you are the president.

459

:

Of a bank branch, a mid-tier bank, first

Horizon National in Tennessee, you can't

460

:

touch any stock that bank has business

with or that the bank has an account with.

461

:

You can't buy or sell that

462

:

Marie Newman: And I

like that a whole bunch

463

:

Jerremy: at all.

464

:

Marie Newman: Yeah.

465

:

So it's there, there's another

opportunity we would have to pull

466

:

this back and it's not necessarily

again, to back best practices, but

467

:

it's not necessarily exactly what

we would do, but conceptually.

468

:

In the UK what they do with elections

is they say, here's 30 K, whatever their

469

:

trans two pounds, here's three months.

470

:

Go and that's all you get.

471

:

So it's publicly funded.

472

:

And I'm not saying that's a

perfect answer, but it does

473

:

solve a whole bunch of things.

474

:

Jerremy: It does.

475

:

Yeah.

476

:

Yeah.

477

:

If you have a fund where every candidate

gets the same amount of money and this

478

:

is the most you can spend, that's it.

479

:

Enjoy.

480

:

Marie Newman: And you can't use your

own money and you can't sell fund,

481

:

and you can't use your friend's

fund money and blah, blah, blah.

482

:

Yeah.

483

:

Jerremy: Hey, I'm all about it.

484

:

I I agree.

485

:

I think I don't know, I don't know

if it would change necessarily

486

:

people's viewpoints or opinions

on politics, but what it would do

487

:

is it would bring a certain level

of different players to the game.

488

:

One of the things that Dave mentioned

is he's excited about the day where

489

:

Washington DC becomes the new sports

arena or the new place where people want,

490

:

instead of going to Hollywood to become

an actor or become a professional DJ or.

491

:

Wanting to become the

next big football star.

492

:

They wanna go to DC 'cause

they want to create incredible

493

:

laws and incredible bills.

494

:

And to your point, give healthcare

opportunities for every single person

495

:

in the United States of America or

take money out of politics where it's

496

:

something that is not as egregiously in

the face of everyone that's voting for

497

:

you, where we know that you're stealing

from us, but we just don't know how.

498

:

Oh, we can't do anything about it.

499

:

Marie Newman: That's right.

500

:

That's right.

501

:

Yeah.

502

:

Jerremy: so for our listeners, that's

what people love about the podcast to

503

:

the degree is we'll start on something

and there's we went down a new path.

504

:

But the reality is that's what

this product and program was.

505

:

Initially, we started discussing guns

and Dave and I were thinking, okay,

506

:

everyone's been telling us to go

and talk about guns and talk about.

507

:

Everything that's happening negatively.

508

:

And then we saw this incredible data

right in front of our face where it

509

:

was not even remotely what we thought.

510

:

We thought that, yeah, take away some

assault rifles and then man, every,

511

:

everything is solved and assignment an

512

:

Marie Newman: No.

513

:

Jerremy: And yeah, the data

was just showing us something

514

:

so different, so transparent.

515

:

Let's do a quick little lightning round,

516

:

Marie Newman: Oh, fun.

517

:

Jerremy: just Yeah.

518

:

Super fast.

519

:

Quickest answer imaginable that you have.

520

:

All right.

521

:

What's the most underrated fix you rarely

hear people talking about in politics?

522

:

Marie Newman: Oh, that's

a really good one.

523

:

It that is already in place,

is that what you're saying?

524

:

Jerremy.

525

:

Jerremy: Not necessarily.

526

:

Marie Newman: I, okay,

527

:

Jerremy: could be in, it could be in

place, or it could not be in place, but

528

:

something

529

:

Marie Newman: so

530

:

Jerremy: it is in

531

:

place, awesome.

532

:

Marie Newman: in place because

there's not a lot that has been fixed.

533

:

I am just, I have a my mother used

to say is that, it's not okay.

534

:

It's you can sometimes not

share every thought in your head

535

:

Jerremy: totally.

536

:

Marie Newman: yeah.

537

:

But Medicare for all, Medicare

would solve that huge healthcare

538

:

problem and economic inequity.

539

:

So about a third of everybody's budget

goes to healthcare and it would solve

540

:

that inequity right away for all

humans in the United States of America.

541

:

Alex: Jerremy won’t let this stay

abstract—he demands ONE chart, 60

542

:

seconds, and Marie doesn’t hesitate.

543

:

Next—the income gap lands like a

gut punch, and the conversation

544

:

swings from corruption to what

working 40 hours even BUYS now…

Show artwork for Solving America's Problems

About the Podcast

Solving America's Problems
Solving America’s Problems isn’t just a podcast—it’s a journey. Co-host Jerremy Newsome, a successful entrepreneur and educator, is pursuing his lifelong dream of running for president. Along the way, he and co-host Dave Conley bring together experts, advocates, and everyday Americans to explore the real, actionable solutions our country needs.

With dynamic formats—one-on-one interviews, panel discussions, and more—we cut through the noise of divisive rhetoric to uncover practical ideas that unite instead of divide. If you’re ready to think differently, act boldly, and join a movement for meaningful change, subscribe now.